When agreement-based pricing breaks — replace it with pass-through

An agreement-based model sets your cost through a clinic partnership quote. Strive's public FAQ directs pricing questions to pricing@strivepharmacy.com — the per-vial number arrives after you contact Strive and work through provider onboarding, not from a browsable public price list. That can produce competitive rates for high-volume partners, which is a real strength when you only order Strive SKUs. The cost is timing and visibility: you do not see the number at the moment you are quoting a patient, and re-checking a rate means another conversation.

A pass-through model inverts that. With Fizy Health, the resolved 503A landed cost appears on each catalog and cart line before you check out, and the platform's margin is a disclosed facilitation fee at payment rather than an opaque per-vial markup. The drug cost is what the pharmacy charges; the platform fee is stated separately. For a clinic quoting cash-pay semaglutide or tirzepatide daily, that means the price you quote and the price you pay are the same visible number, with no markup layer hidden inside the vial cost.

Replace an agreement-based model when the lack of upfront pricing actively slows your business. Common signals: you delay quoting a new patient because you are waiting on a rate from pricing@strivepharmacy.com; you cannot confidently set cash-pay prices because your landed cost is not visible at the point of sale; you suspect a markup layer but cannot separate drug cost from platform margin; or your volume has shifted and you are not sure your clinic agreement still reflects it without reopening a conversation.

Another signal is operational, not just financial: if paid orders get rejected after payment for SIG or licensure issues, the pricing question compounds with a validation gap. A pass-through platform like Fizy Health pairs visible per-vial cost with pre-submit cart validation, so the same workflow that shows your margin also catches the errors that cost you a refund cycle. If none of these signals apply — your Strive agreement rates are strong and your refill day is clean on a single-compounder portal — an agreement model may still be the right fit. Replace it when the model, not the vendor, is the constraint.