Why the cost split changes total cost of ownership
In a direct-compounder model like South Lake Pharmacy, the main cost layers are: in-house compounding cost (USP 795/797/800 cleanroom, FDA-registered cGMP raw materials, two-lab third-party testing for potency, sterility, and endotoxin), shipping and handling from the Zephyrhills, Florida facility, and any portal or access costs associated with the LifeFile ordering system. Ask South Lake Compounding whether there is a separate recurring charge for LifeFile portal access, whether it is per clinic or per user, and whether it scales at any threshold. Then ask whether that cost is included in your per-vial clinic agreement rate or itemized separately. A blended rate that includes portal access costs is effectively a combined drug-plus-software price — not wrong, but important to understand when comparing to alternatives.
Also consider total cost of ownership over time. If a recurring LifeFile access fee is separate from drug cost, your effective cost per vial increases as you scale. If it is bundled into the per-vial rate, the effective cost per portal user is high on low volume and low on high volume. Neither structure is inherently better — but you need to know which applies to compute a meaningful comparison.